top of page

Time to make primary care improvement business as usual

Leanne Wells and Paresh Dawda, Prestantia Health



Primary care is the mainstay of health systems yet many countries grapple with how to sustain primary care at the same time as they strive to ensure delivery is safe, high-quality and continues to improve and innovate to respond to people’s evolving needs.


The missing link in primary care reforms

The Strengthening Medicare Taskforce triggered a first wave of reforms designed to modernise Medicare and put it on a more sustainable footing. The report recognised that change management and cultural change will be required to implement ambitious reforms over time. The report offered high-level recommendations under this theme but fell short of specific ideas about how leadership and cultural change could be realised.

 

A year or so earlier, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) launched the National Safety and Quality Primary and Community Health Care Standards laying out three standards which all primary and community healthcare services can apply: clinical governance; partnering with consumers; and clinical safety.


The missing link to tackling these policy ambitions and standards aspirations is a systematic, nationally spearheaded approach to primary health care improvement.

 

Improvement gives the people best placed to influence quality the time, permission, skills, and resources they need to solve them. It involves systematic, coordinated approaches using specific tools and methods with the aim of bringing about a measurable improvement in the quality of care.


The benefits of improvement to patients, service users and society are wide-reaching, and can include the way care is delivered and the way the system operates. They include improved access to appointments and services; smoother flow between services; care avoidance through earlier diagnosis; improved safety and improved outcomes through reliable adoption of best practices. The same applies to organisations where the benefits range from efficiency gains via removing waste, delay, and duplication to productivity gains from faster technology adoption.

 

Most importantly, improvement approaches are not just a mechanism for improving care processes and pathways and tacking variation. They are indispensable when it comes to tackling the biggest delivery and transformation challenges that healthcare faces.


Promising improvement forays

Improvement is often well funded in hospitals, with staff trained in evidence-based improvement methodologies, internal roles for this work and support from dedicated agencies to do it. This is not the case in general practice. While the same is not replicated in primary care, there have been forays.

 

The Australian Primary Care Collaboratives (APCC) operated from 2004 to 2014 and used a methodology developed by the Institute for Health Improvement to facilitate improvement in Australian general practice. To incentivise general practices to undertake data-driven improvement in patient outcomes and the delivery of best-practice care, the Practice Incentive Program Quality Improvement Incentive (PIPQI) was put in place.

 

Primary Health Networks (PHNs) were established to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of medical services and improve coordination of care. Some have been vanguards in innovation and transformation of the primary care system. Improvement knowledge and practice, however, remains variable across PHNs and general practice. PHNs have largely been left to self-determine the nature and intensity of their improvement activity rather than its scope being prescribed by government.  As value-based health care and the ‘quintuple aim’ gain primacy, not only a culture of improvement but capability and capacity at both the PHN and clinical service delivery level becomes critically important[ix].

 

Other levers such as the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Standards for General Practice and voluntary accreditation against these standards help assure quality and contribute to a culture of improvement.


All up, Australia has a patchwork of improvement initiatives. Some have shown promise but have not been sustained nor linked to an ongoing policy agenda. Others have helped elevate and encourage an improvement mindset but have lacked capacity and capability to see improvement practice fully embedded. None have been systemically and consistently implemented.

 

We need large-scale transformation across the whole GP sector and primary care in the longer-run, that takes us beyond the 20% of practices the APCC touched. This is our challenge, and our opportunity.


A national improvement strategy for primary care

Value-based, future-proofed primary health care commands enablers that will embed continuous improvement in mainstream general practices and overcome the numerous barriers to the adoption which range from lack of a system mindset and skills in change leadership and improvement.

 

Key enablers of participation in the APCC were beliefs and practice culture, the presence of a champion, opportunities for critical comparison and ‘meso’ level support from a primary care organisation such as a PHN. The identification of champions is consistent with other observations that organisations with successful records in improvement attribute their success to strong clinical leadership. Barriers to participation included insufficient time and resources, unfamiliarity with and inflexibility of the methodology, and inadequate meso-level support.

 

A systematic approach to improvement in Australian primary health care is needed if we are to strive towards excellence, innovation and transformation, acting on the principles Minister Butler has set for the future of Medicare.

 

A national strategy that is governed by guiding principles and specified actions at all levels within the system is the route we need to take.



Guiding principles

Principles for improvement originate in the manufacturing industries. While there are differences between these contexts and health care, these principles transcend sectors and apply to all modes of health care delivery:

 

  • Improvement takes a system view and advocates a culture of and commitment to quality throughout the organisation

  • Improvement efforts are human-centred and involve a commitment to co-production with consumers and communities. Striving to meet the needs of patients with safe, high-quality care is grounded in the idea of human beings caring for human beings encompassing patient, workforce, and community experiences [xvi]

  • Improvement recognises the need to create an organisational context that allows change to take place. This involves commitment to capability building; learning through education, training, and knowledge exchange; and implementation through collaboration and teamwork

  • Improvement is an iterative process that asks new questions, tests, and refines solutions before practical implementation at scale can occur

  • Improvement is rigorous. It involves extensive use of data analytics to identify areas for improvement; feedback systems to facilitate continuous improvement based on real-time insights; small pilots or ‘tests of change’ to implement innovations and refine them before wider rollout; and standardised approaches to reap the benefits of economies of scale.



Action at all levels

A strategic, cohesive approach to improvement involving interdependent steps at multiple levels is needed if we are to transform Australian primary health care.


Macro system

  • A clear vision from government authentically codesigned with clinicians, consumers and PHNs

  • A National Primary Care Transformation Centre to work closely with professional bodies, government, PHNs and hospital districts to:

    • Serve as a national dissemination hub for successful initiatives, spreading knowledge and learning, and supporting adoption

    • Build capacity and capability at all levels (C-suite, clinicians, consumers and managers and administrators in sectors that interface with primary care)

    • House a leadership ‘academy’ to support consumer and carer literacy and involvement, and champion joint leadership development between clinicians and consumers

    • Provide thought leadership to catalyse policy change

  • Leadership from professional bodies through standards and education

  • Support the creation and improvement of systems for transparent sharing of data about performance with patients and the public and local peers

  • Financial resources for PHNs to support improvement activity within their footprints

  • Funds to provide general practices and teams with the time and resources to engage in a whole-of-practice approach to improvement.


‘Meso’ system

  • Charge PHNs with the responsibility to coordinate regional improvement plans in collaboration with their local GPs, practices, and advisory structures.  These would use resources from the Centre and involve:

    • Development of a shared vision and values for improvement

    • Leading a culture of improvement and innovation and investment in improvement through leadership and governance activities involving Boards, Clinical and Community Councils

    • Engaging placed-based Improvement Advisers to:

      • coordinate delivery of a suite of nationally developed and credentialled familiarisation, education, training and coaching programs for PHN and practice staff

      • support execution, monitoring, and evaluation of improvement initiatives in general practices

      • support the development of policies, programs, and networks for community engagement in efforts to improve quality of care, an essential ingredient to improvement.


Micro system

  • Clinical leadership development and support

  • Engagement with patients and carers

  • Support to develop knowledge and technical expertise in improvement methodologies for key practice staff, and associated competencies such as data literacy

  • Whole-of-practice education.


Conclusion: primary health care improvement is the future of health

Australians expect, deserve and value high quality, accessible and affordable primary health care services coordinated through a general practice team. General practice is under considerable strain and concern about its sustainability is reverberating in the community, in policy circles and in the media.  This is a profound problem because high performing health care systems rely on strong, viable, vibrant GP-led primary care services. Supporting practices with systemic ways to improve, innovate and transform through proven improvement methodologies could never be more important.

 

This month the OECD, who says that healthcare has been a passive recipient of innovation, will host a High Level Policy Forum to examine the opportunities and challenges of incorporating transformative new tools into health system governance and improving clinical practice, and how can these developments improve the experience for patients and practitioners.

 

We have the opportunity to avoid a piecemeal approach and further develop improvement capacity and capability in primary care as a key system lever.  An improvement ethos is fundamental to reshaping and revitalising Australian primary care, spearheaded by a revitalised general practice.

 

The Strengthening Medicare agenda should be the spur for a national improvement strategy for primary care. Such as strategy could be the anchor point for the leadership and cultural change theme of the Taskforce’s report.

 

Primary care improvement is the future of health and Australia has an opportunity to lead.


Acknowledgement

We wish to thank Angelene True and Dr Walid Jammal for their kind feedback.


To download a PDF version of this article click below.

QualityImprovement_PH
.pdf
Download PDF • 293KB

References

  • Breadon, P., Romaneis, D., Fox, L., Bolton, J., and Richardson L (2022) A new Medicare: Strengthening General Practice. Grattan Institute.

  • Brown, V., Fuller, J., Ford, D., and Dunbar, J (2014) The enablers and barriers for the uptake, use and spread of Primary Care Collaboratives in Australia.  ANU and UQ.

  • Curry N, Goodwin, Naylor, C et al (2008) Practice-based commissioning: reinvigorate, replace or abandon. London. Kings Fund.

  • Dawda, P., Jenkins, R., and Varnam, R (2010) Quality improvement in general practice. Discussion Paper. Kings Fund.

  • Dawda, P., (2016) Primary health networks and leadership for quality improvement. Australasian Medical Journal.

  • Gilmore, B. et al (2023) Institutionalising community engagement for quality care: moving beyond the rhetoric. British Medical Journal, BMJ 2023;381:e072638

  • Goodall AH (2011) Physician-leaders and hospital performance: is there an association? Social Science and Medicine [internet]. Elsevier BV. Aug; 73 (4) 535-9.

  • Jones, B and Pereira, P (2023) Briefing: Improvement as a mainstream business.  The UK Health Foundation.

  • Jones, B and Pereira, P. (2023) A guide to making the case for improvement. The UK Health Foundation.

  • Jones, B and Pereira, P (2023) Briefing: Improvement as a mainstream business.  The UK Health Foundation.

  • Knight, A., Fraser, J., and Pond, D. (2022) It is time to reinvest in quality improvement collaboratives to support Australian general practice.  Medical Journal of Australia, 216(9) 438-440.

  • Starfield, B. (2012) Primary care: an increasingly important contributor to effectiveness, equity, and efficiency of health services. SESPAS report, Science Direct

  • Starfield, B. (2009) Primary care and equity in health: the importance to effectiveness and equity of responsiveness to peoples’ needs. Humanity and Society, Vol 33, Issues 1-2

  • Wolf JA, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela SL. Reexamining “Defining Patient Experience”: The human experience in healthcare.Patient Experience Journal. 2021; 8(1):16-29. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1594.

  • World Health Organisation (2023) Regional Framework on the future of primary health care in the Western Pacific.

120 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page